32 Comments
User's avatar
Tad Huckabee's avatar

Any intelligent person knows what Kirk was.

Tmina's avatar

Oh fuck off mikey - she actually wiped her ass with his face!

Doreen D's avatar

Kirk chose college campuses for reason. He wanted to influence young men but also debating someone his age would be more difficult. It happened. Good for this young lady that went head to head with him.

Donovan Marley's avatar

No amount of Republican perfume can cover the lingering stink of racism in Charlie Kirk’s diatribes.

Terentev Valerii's avatar

Charlie (RIP) did not even know where Ukraine or Finland were on the map, Charlie did not know even the simplest facts of the reality in Europe from XX and XXI centuries. He was a typical MAGA for MAGA: poor education, disregard for facts, manipulation (there is tones of mutual manipulation), banal, unoriginal -- i.e., he had no idea that he developed generated on his own.

Charli Kirk:

“… NATO expansion to Finland was a mistake. Finland is very Russian. In a lot of ways… Finland was even neutral in World War II.”

https://youtu.be/afAObpz10SE?si=U3DbCW3i--PfKGFh

Charlie Kirk: “Is Crimea part of Russia or Ukraine?”

Answer: “Ukraine.”

Charlie K.: “That’s where we don’t agree.”

- From Q&A / Debate | Cambridge Union, 19th May 2025

Charlie Kirk lies:

“We’ve funded Ukraine upwards $200 bn”

- Cambridge Union, 19th May 2025.

There are videos where Charlie claims it to be $250 bn, but he'd never go with Trump's lies saying $300 bn and $350 bn.

Facts: Since 2014, the US Congress has made laws to aid Ukraine and other allies as part of the Operation Atlantic Resolve (OAR), associated with the Russian aggression in Europe:

The total amount of appropriations so far is $187 bn.

For Ukraine proper: $119 bn.

$89 bn still remain to be obligated or disbursed.

$3.6 bn expired.

- Source: www.ukraineoversight.gov/Funding/

laura oshea's avatar

Charlie was debating a Cambridge student. Charlie quit community college!!! He was out classed and out done!!!

Howlin Wolfe's avatar

Not everyone can do what Middlhurst did. Certainly not me. But I am really glad someone can, and that more will.

Audrey Peterman's avatar

Wow!! Give this young woman a Nobel Prize. She so deftly cut the Gordian Knot!

laura oshea's avatar

Middlehurst is in the sisterhood of smart women!!! I love it!!!🥰

Bill Suefert's avatar

Would love to have read the whole conversation. But this reminds me of that fellow who loves to talk over his opponent specially when they start to make sense!

laura oshea's avatar

It is on You Tube just look up Charlie Kirk and Cambridge debate!!!!!

laura oshea's avatar

It is likely on you tube. Like no transcript!

Dr. Ozzie's avatar

“I’ll take ‘Things that never happened’ for $400, Alex!”

Karen's avatar

Poor decision to have an AI male voice read this!

Michael Southon's avatar

I saw the debate - she didn’t do a ‘takedown’ of Kirk, she simply read from her phone. I wouldn’t even call it debating.

Karen's avatar

There were NOTES on her phone! Debaters are allowed to use notes. She is a 20 year old uni student debating a 31 year old “experienced” with one on one sessions. And she did unsettle him causing him to discombobulate with her concise answers and questions.

Tunamelt's avatar

so she just let him talk for a minute?