Conservatives' Dark Plan to Reawaken Zombie Law
Dark Threat to Women's Rights Ready To Pounce Again!
Don't miss out! ⏳ The clock is running out on our Supporter Appreciation Discount – join today to get all the latest insights!
The Comstock Act, a 150-year-old law intended to censor “obscene” materials, has resurfaced as a potential weapon for anti-abortion activists and lawmakers.
Originally passed in 1873, the Act criminalized sending materials related to contraception, abortion, or anything deemed “indecent” through the mail.
This “Antiobscenity Crusader’s Law” was the brainchild of Anthony Comstock, a man infamous for his crusades against vice. It granted him extraordinary powers to restrict access to information.
For most of the 20th century, the Act lay dormant, rarely enforced, and largely seen as an obsolete artifact of a more repressive era. But with the reversal of Roe v. Wade in 2022, the Comstock Act has re-entered discussions among anti-abortion advocates and conservative politicians.
Their goal?
To use this “Zombie Law” as a backdoor means to restrict abortion access on a national scale without passing new legislation.
How the Comstock Act Could Shape a Post-Roe America
One might ask, “How could a law from the 1800s affect us today?” The answer lies in the vague yet powerful language of the Comstock Act.
While outdated, the law remains embedded in federal statutes. Its broad prohibition of “obscene” or “vile” materials covers abortion-related information and medications, allowing the government to restrict what can be mailed across state lines.
If enforced, the Act could effectively ban the mailing of abortion pills, a key method of early abortion in many states.
With a new conservative administration in the White House, especially one led by a figure like Donald Trump, there would be a renewed focus on enforcing the Act.
The Department of Justice could reinterpret the law’s wording to aggressively prosecute anyone mailing abortion medications, even in states where abortion remains legal.
The consequences of such a national ban would override the protections many states have established post-Dobbs.
A Dangerous Precedent for Women’s Health and Autonomy
Using the Comstock Act to enforce a national ban on abortion medications is not just about controlling what arrives in the mail. This kind of enforcement would set a dangerous precedent that impacts all facets of reproductive health.
Experts have highlighted that restricting access to abortion medications could push individuals to seek later-term abortions, which come with higher risks and costs.
Others might seek unsafe methods, endangering their health in the absence of safe, legal options. [Remember the so-called “Good Ole Days” conservatives push?]
The impact would not be felt equally. Wealthier individuals would still have the means to seek out-of-state care, but lower-income people would be left with few options.
Reproductive rights advocates warn that a nationwide ban would exacerbate health disparities, leaving the most vulnerable populations – young people, people of color, and rural residents – with limited access to care.
What’s at Stake if the Comstock Act Is Revived?
Reviving the Comstock Act under a conservative administration would go beyond abortion.
The law’s original language covers all “indecent” materials, which could theoretically lead to restrictions on contraceptives, sexual health education, and other essential health information.
This means a wide-reaching impact on American lives, particularly for those already struggling under the patchwork of state-level restrictions that emerged after Dobbs.
This prospect of a sweeping national ban on abortion isn’t far-fetched. As highlighted in a recent Scientific American article, anti-abortion advocates argue that, in the absence of Roe, the Comstock Act’s language should be enforced to the letter.
With a conservative Supreme Court unlikely to challenge such enforcement, a Trump administration could use this law to bypass congressional gridlock, making abortion inaccessible in every state – even in those where it is legal today.
Your support means everything!
💪 By subscribing, you're helping me shine a light on critical issues facing women in a post-Trump world. Together, we can keep these stories front and center – and make a real difference.
How Trump’s Re-election Could Reignite the “Antiobscenity Crusader’s Law”
If Trump regains the Oval Office, his administration could turn to the Comstock Act to enforce abortion restrictions nationally.
The Act offers a unique advantage to those seeking a federal ban: it’s already law. There’s no need for Congress to draft or pass new legislation, which would likely face immense public backlash.
Instead, the Comstock Act could be dusted off and weaponized, bypassing democratic processes altogether.
The consequences would be profound.
Imagine a scenario where the Comstock Act restricts both the mailing of abortion medications and even the instruments used in in-clinic abortions, as experts have suggested.
Such measures could disrupt reproductive healthcare across the country, affecting gynecological care more broadly by restricting access to tools and medications commonly used in obstetric care.
The threat isn’t just hypothetical; it’s a real possibility that hinges on the upcoming election.
A Call to Action: Vote to Protect Women’s Rights and Health
The resurgence of this “Zombie Law” underscores the importance of participating in the 2024 election.
While the Comstock Act’s reanimation may seem like a plot from a horror movie, it’s a reality that voters have the power to prevent.
The choice is stark: allow a centuries-old law to dismantle modern reproductive freedoms, or make a stand to protect the progress achieved over the last fifty years.
Every vote counts in preventing the return of the Comstock Act and keeping it from taking center stage in a modern-day war on women’s health.
This election will determine whether reproductive freedom remains a core American value or becomes yet another casualty of outdated, regressive laws.
Our ballot choices in 2024 could be the final defense against a law that belongs in history books – not in our future.
Voting in this election isn’t just about policy; it’s about ensuring that this “Zombie Law” stays dead and buried where it belongs.