Democracy on Life Support

How Gerrymandering and Voter Suppression Are Killing the American Dream

Introduction: The Paradox of Protecting Democracy

Welcome to the theater of American politics, where a peculiar and troubling paradox has taken center stage: the notion of undermining democracy to "protect" it.

In this absurdist play, gerrymandering and voter suppression perform lead roles, purportedly acting in the name of electoral integrity while simultaneously eroding the very foundations of democratic representation.

As we embark on this journey through the funhouse mirror of American democracy, we'll explore how state legislatures are turning elections into a rigged game show.

This alarming trend puts the phrase "government of the people, by the people, for the people" at risk of becoming as outdated as a floppy disk.

A Brief History of Voting Rights: From Property Owners to Present Day

Once upon a time in a land not so far away, voting was a privilege reserved for white male property owners.

Fast forward through a couple of centuries, a civil war, and a few constitutional amendments, and we've progressed to... well, a system where your vote might count if you can jump through enough hoops and your district hasn't been carved up like a Thanksgiving turkey.

Let's take a whirlwind tour through the evolution of voting rights in America:

• 1870: The 15th Amendment grants African American men the right to vote (on paper, at least).

• 1920: Women finally got the vote with the 19th Amendment because nothing says "land of the free," like waiting 144 years to let half the population participate in democracy.

• 1965: The Voting Rights Act becomes the grand finale in this voting rights extravaganza, banning literacy tests and providing federal oversight in areas with a history of discrimination.

• 2013: The Supreme Court decides in Shelby County v. Holder that racism is over and guts key provisions of the Voting Rights Act, setting the stage for "Voter Suppression: The Reboot."

Gerrymandering: The Art of Political Cartography

Ah, gerrymandering – the political equivalent of rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic, except the ship is democracy, and instead of saving passengers, we're making sure only certain ones get lifeboats.

This delightful practice involves drawing electoral districts that look less like geographical areas and more like abstract expressionist paintings gone wrong.

Modern gerrymandering employs advanced data analytics and mapping software to create districts so contorted they'd make Salvador Dalí say, "That's a bit much, don't you think?"

The result? A system so skewed that Republicans still have an advantage in the House after the 2024 elections, thanks to their disproportionate control over the redistricting process.

It's as if the rules of a game were being rewritten mid-match to ensure a particular team always wins – a practice that would be laughable in sports but is somehow accepted in the arena of democracy.

Voter Suppression: Modern Tactics in Historical Context

If gerrymandering is the main course in this unappetizing meal of democracy, voter suppression is the bitter dessert.

Since the Supreme Court's 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision, states have been on a voter suppression spree that would make a magician jealous.

Recent data shows that the racial turnout gap between white and nonwhite voters has been growing since 2012, particularly in areas previously covered by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

It's almost as if certain politicians looked at the Voting Rights Act and said, "Challenge accepted."Let's examine some of the greatest hits from the voter suppression playlist:

1. Strict voter ID laws (Because preventing the virtually non-existent crime of voter impersonation is apparently worth disenfranchising millions)

2. Purging voter rolls (Nothing says democracy like surprise un-registration)

3. Closing polling places in minority neighborhoods (Making voting as convenient as finding a pay phone in 2024)

4. Restrictions on early and mail-in voting (Because, apparently, convenience is the enemy of democracy)

The justification for these measures – preventing virtually non-existent voter fraud – is akin to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut that may not even exist.

For instance, a study found that out of one billion ballots cast between 2000 and 2014, there were only 31 credible instances of voter impersonation. That's a fraud rate of 0.0000031% for those keeping score at home.

The Erosion of Democratic Norms

The combined effect of gerrymandering and voter suppression goes beyond mere electoral manipulation; it represents a fundamental erosion of democratic norms.

This erosion is further exacerbated by executive overreach, judicial decisions that often abet rather than mitigate democratic decline, and increasing partisan polarization.

The situation bears an unsettling resemblance to dystopian narratives, where powerful entities undermine core values such as freedom and justice under the pretense of protection.

Just as in these fictional scenarios, the real-world erosion of democratic norms is often gradual and cloaked in the language of security and integrity.

Consider the following dystopian parallels:

1. Control and Manipulation of Information: Misinformation campaigns and AI-generated fake videos that would make the Ministry of Truth blush.

2. Restrictive Laws and Regulations: Voter ID requirements that are more complicated than the plot of "Inception."

3. Surveillance and Control: Monitoring and purging voter rolls with an efficiency that would impress Big Brother.

4. Racial and Economic Oppression: Tactics rooted in racism continue to disenfranchise minority communities because, apparently, we're stuck in a time loop.

Legal Battles and Legislative Actions

The legal landscape surrounding voting rights is as convoluted as a gerrymandered district. While the Supreme Court has ruled against racial gerrymandering, it has declared partisan gerrymandering beyond federal courts' reach.

This has shifted the battleground to state courts, where outcomes have varied widely.

Recent court cases and legislative actions highlight the ongoing struggle:

• In Georgia, the state Supreme Court declined to reinstate controversial election rules that would have made drop boxes harder to use and allowed county officials to refuse to certify election results.

• Montana saw a trial court permanently block three restrictive voting laws passed in 2021, including eliminating Election Day registration.

• Arizona federal courts issued preliminary injunctions against two state laws that were seen as restrictive, preventing their enforcement.

• Delaware's state court issued a permanent injunction against the state's no-excuse vote-by-mail system, ruling it violated the state constitution.

The absurdity reaches new heights when considering that the very institutions meant to protect democratic principles are often complicit in their erosion.

It's as if the referees in a game not only refuse to call fouls but actively participate in tilting the playing field.

The Impact on Future Elections

The consequences of these anti-democratic practices are no laughing matter. Gerrymandering reduces electoral competition and makes the House less responsive to shifts in the national vote.

An additional percentage point increase in either party's national popular vote would net that party only 7.8 more seats on average, compared to 9.2 under a nonpartisan baseline.

It's like playing a game of Monopoly where one player starts with Boardwalk and Park Place, and the other gets Baltic Avenue and a pat on the back.

The result? A system so skewed that it threatens the very foundation of representative democracy.

Fighting Back: Grassroots Efforts and Proposed Solutions

But fear not, dear readers! All is not lost in this tragicomedy of democracy. Grassroots organizations, legal advocates, and some state courts are fighting back against these anti-democratic measures.

It's like watching David take on Goliath if Goliath had an army of lawyers and a war chest funded by dark money. But hey, who doesn't love an underdog story?

Some proposed solutions and ongoing efforts include:

1. Independent redistricting commissions to take the map-drawing process out of partisan hands.

2. Voting rights restoration efforts, particularly for ex-felons.

3. Legal and legislative reforms, such as the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.

4. Grassroots organizing and public awareness campaigns pushing back against anti-democratic practices.

5. Technological solutions, such as open-source mapping tools to create fair districts.

Conclusion: The Future of American Democracy

As we navigate this political landscape that increasingly resembles a Kafka novel, one question remains: Can we save our system before it's too late?

Or will future generations look back on this period as the time when the American experiment in self-governance jumped the shark?

The fight for voting rights has been a long and arduous one, from property-based voting to the Voting Rights Act and beyond. Today's challenges may seem daunting, but they're just the latest chapter in an ongoing struggle.

The absurdity of undermining democracy in the name of protecting it would be comical if the stakes weren't so high.

As we confront the challenges of gerrymandering and voter suppression, we must not lose sight of the fundamental principle that in a true democracy, it is the people who should choose their representatives, not the other way around.

So, dear citizens, the next time you hear a politician claim they're protecting democracy while supporting measures that would make a dictator blush, remember: In the game of democracy, you're either at the table or on the menu.

And right now, far too many Americans are being served up with a side of voter suppression.

Let's work to ensure that the phrase "government of the people, by the people, for the people" doesn't become as outdated as a floppy disk.

After all, democracy may be on life support, but with enough effort and civic engagement, we might just be able to nurse it back to health – preferably before we all end up in a real-life version of "The Hunger Games: Election Edition."

The task before us is to turn this principle from an aspirational ideal into a lived reality, ensuring that the American experiment in self-governance doesn't become a cautionary tale in the annals of history.

It's time to roll up our sleeves, get involved, and show that in the face of absurdity, the spirit of democracy can not only survive but thrive.

Enjoying this article?
Support independent writing and receive free eBooks and well-researched articles.
Paid subscribers receive special, in-depth downloads and more.