Epstein Survivors Weaponize Opposition Research Against Congress
Congress Can’t Hide: Survivors Demand the Truth
On September 24, investigative journalist Tara Palmeri sent shockwaves through Washington with a single X/Twitter post:
“The Epstein survivors are fed up. They’re using Washington’s own playbook — opposition research — on lawmakers blocking the Epstein files. I’m publishing the first piece in ‘The Reckoning’ series in The Red Letter on a GOP senator with close ties to Ghislaine Maxwell.”
This was not just a media tease. It was a warning shot from a movement that has grown tired of waiting for justice.
The survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, long ignored and betrayed by the justice system, are now wielding the very tools of power that have been used against them for decades.
Their target: members of Congress who are obstructing the full release of the Epstein files.
The New Playbook: Opposition Research as a Weapon for Justice
For years, opposition research has been the dark art of Washington insiders, a way to dig up dirt on rivals and control the narrative. Now, Epstein survivors are flipping the script.
They are meticulously gathering and publishing information about lawmakers who are blocking transparency, exposing not just their votes but their connections, motivations, and, in some cases, their personal ties to the Epstein-Maxwell network.
This is not a smear campaign. It is a demand for accountability. Survivors and their advocates are naming names, holding press conferences, and flooding social media with evidence.
They are making it politically costly for any lawmaker to stand in the way of the truth.
Naming Names: The First Targets
The campaign’s first major target is Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). Once seen as a possible ally for transparency, Murkowski is now under fire for her vote to block the release of the Epstein files.
But the survivors’ campaign goes further: they have uncovered and publicized her longstanding connections to Ghislaine Maxwell’s husband, Scott Borgerson, and documented multiple public appearances with Maxwell and Borgerson.
These revelations, first reported by Palmeri in “The Reckoning” series on her The Red Letter Substack, have raised serious questions about conflicts of interest and the real reasons behind Murkowski’s resistance.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) is also in the crosshairs. Survivors accuse him of using closed-door hearings and excessive redactions to delay or obscure the release of the files, allegedly to protect powerful figures - including Donald Trump - who are named in the documents.
A Demand for Justice
What makes this campaign so potent is its refusal to play by partisan rules. Survivors are framing their fight as a bipartisan or nonpartisan struggle for justice and accountability.
Their message is simple: no one, regardless of party, should be allowed to shield abusers of children from the consequences of their actions.
The Power of Public Pressure
The survivors’ tactics are working. After months of lobbying, rallies, and viral social media campaigns, the House Oversight Committee has begun releasing some Epstein-related files.
But the releases have been heavily redacted, and many documents were already public, fueling suspicions of a cover-up .
Survivors and their allies are not backing down. They are demanding the unredacted release of all files, with victims’ identities protected, and they are making it clear that any lawmaker who stands in their way will be held accountable—not just in the press, but at the ballot box.
Help fund more reporting that calls out political prosecutions and protects the rule of law. Join as a free or paid subscriber now.
“The Reckoning” and the Road Ahead
Tara Palmeri’s “The Reckoning” series is amplifying the survivors’ voices and shining a light on the political, financial, and social ties that have protected abusers for far too long.
By publishing detailed opposition research and leveraging media attention, the series is putting unprecedented pressure on Congress to act.
This is more than a campaign for transparency. It is a movement to restore trust in the justice system, to expose the networks of power that have enabled abuse, and to ensure that survivors are never silenced again.
The Survivors Will Not Be Silenced
The Epstein survivors’ campaign is a masterclass in grassroots advocacy and political strategy. By using the tools of power against those who have wielded them for decades.
They are forcing a reckoning - not just for the politicians who stand in their way, but for a system that has too often protected the powerful at the expense of the vulnerable.
The message is clear: the era of silence is over. The survivors are speaking, and this time, Washington is being forced to listen.
Epilogue
To amplify this,
email your two Senators, your House member, and the relevant committee staff with the key facts and ask for an on-the-record reply within 72 hours;
alert Murkowski’s major donors and PACs and ask whether they will pause contributions until she responds;
submit a 150–200 word letter to your local paper;
send a sourced tip to one investigative reporter;
post a tight, linked summary on social and tag officials and outlets.
To find donors fast: search OpenSecrets for “Lisa Murkowski contributors,” open Top Contributors and PACs, then cross check names on FEC filings; for companies, go to their site and grab Public Affairs, Government Relations, or PAC contact info, then send a short, factual note with your question and a link to the evidence. Log every response.




This is for Virginia Guiffre and all the survivors. Healing can begin when all is known
America's rotten regime is painting towns with fear, by pledging anybody speaking out will be hunted down. When fear paralyzes, it means not enough is known to make decisions.
What I came to realize was, if we don't speak truth to power now, Trumpian Regiments WILL eventually go after all Americans and anyone else. Justifications will be made up LATER - if needed.
An excuse can be you were not wearing your red hat. Or, you drew baby tantrum cartoons of the asshole. Or, you did anything but the Vance Dance at the rave. Maybe you went out after CURFEW. Or, you dared to learn something, ask questions, or even THINK independently. Maybe you showed EMPATHY.
It could be ANYTHING at all. It doesn't have to make sense with reality. Given the pivotal nature of the upcoming midterms, LATER is closer than you think.
The Don needs his police state in place before that, because afterwards Congress is likely to prosecute him and others who violated their oaths and had partaken in criminal acts, against various constitutions.
Anxienty about offending this monster has especially risen since Vance and Miller had mouthed off as the surrogate hosts on the Charlie Kirk Show.
Time Magazine:
JD Vance Vows Crackdown on ‘Festering Violence’ From ‘Far Left’ While Hosting Charlie Kirk Show
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PxRHiLb-bbw
I never heard of Kirk or his shows before. I don't waste my time on being an asswipe. But, after watching to see what he was about, it appeared this is a professional propagandist who was making a living off hating and harming others.
Recent firings seem to imply proof that there are consequences to criticizing the big Trumpo or any of his minows like Kirk.
But, the terminations were all voluntarily done by employers. Their agreements with employees and contractors, still prevail over the fat elephant's whinings and snorting.
When the Jimmy Kimmel Show went dark, several staff likely had exit clauses already written into their contracts with very steep financial disincentives for arbitrary terminations.
How the FCC torpedoed Jimmy Kimmel | CBC About That
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Fw6wSwhjHcI
Despite all this, employers are still cutting going forward. Its more sustainability than nursing a tyrant's bloated ego, whose thin-skinned self never matured into a bottle of good wine and became a tub of vinegar instead.
These terminations are the real consequences of permanent reductions in purchasing power the Trump regime continues to cause across America's population.
Most people have already felt his hits. And, their taxes are paying for them to continue. It's not because of any discord on what's wrong with Trump, Charlie Kirk, or voicing concerns about governance.
Trump's erratic policies are creating extreme uncertainty for companies operating within the United States, while shredding global civilization.
Add the AI revolution, militarized ICE build up, Trump's war games, tarrifs, bizzare defunding, people disappearing, and you get an economy with fewer customers able to buy anything.
Its just too risky for organizations to keep employees when revenue to pay them is evaporating and raw materials are becoming scarce.
The suggestion that Vance and Miller could comb through a billion posts a day, using AI to find any dissidence, IS truly disturbing.
The question we ALL should be asking, is: how technically feasible is it for Vance to carry out such threats TODAY?
Let's start with considering the source of Vance's ideas on AI.
Vance and Miller are not computer engineers. They have no training at all in a field that is even more complex and daunting than how fast medicine is changing. Compare their expertise to RFK Jr's knowledge about anything, and you'll know what I mean.
It says a lot about the engineering behind AI, where the goal is to create an artificial human entity in the form of software.
Neurologists don't even understand what an authentic being is. So how can software developers know what needs to go into a fake one? Do you think Vance and Miller do?
Anything Vance and Miller KNOW about AI has come from a marketing brochure.
And, in this case, it's a sales pitch from Oracle - the first vendor of SQL based databases that appeared in the early 1980s.
Oracle was slow, clunky, and tended to choke on very little in that first decade. And, it still does without constant optimization, according to their manuals:
Oracle Corporation. Common Performance Problems Found in Databases. Oracle Help Center, 2023. https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/23/tdppt/common-performance-problems-found-databases.html
Decades later, this same company released off-the-shelf business applications that supposedly could be adopted to different organizations. They turned out not to be as easy to customize as Oracle had promised.
I worked at a major electronics manufacturer once, that had purchased Oracle ERP for a couple of million dollars. An Oracle certified vendor was hired to install it.
The project was to take three months. It ballooned to hundreds of millions of dollars, and went into overtime by several years.
Many hacks had to be invented to make the system BARELY work in the way the company wanted.
It's because Oracle's vision of customization is limited to business workflows - how work gets passed between people. Customers saw it as a scaffold they could quickly rewrite to turn it into their own proprietary system.
But, even worse is Oracle's tendency to market "proof of concept" prototypes as if they were stable products, while they were still getting fixed:
The Great Database War 1978 to 1992
https://archivesit.org.uk/blog/the-great-database-war-1978-to-1992/
Now, Oracle is doing the same thing with AI.
Stargate is the federal AI project Vance and Miller had referenced, which Oracle is part of.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stargate_LLC
Oracle’s AI orchestration is very brittle. They don't actually sell their own AI engine.
Instead, it’s a patchwork of third party platforms, like ChatGPT, Grok, Co-pilot, Gemini - stitched together through custom agents in Oracle products. Their software sends prompts to external AI vendors and saves whatever comes back.
AI Agents for Oracle Fusion Application: Next-Gen Intelligent Automation
https://blogs.oracle.com/ateam/post/ai-agents-for-oracle-fa-nextgen-intelligent-automation
Each of these platforms warns that their own systems hallucinate. What does this actually mean in terms of reliability?
Behind an AI system is a gigantic neural network that gets shared by the users which connect to it.
Each connection is through a session. Every session is given it's own limited memory to process the user's prompts, and to assemble answers. This block of memory stays with the session, and isn't shared.
AI keeps track of conversations with users as an ongoing narrative in each session's memory space. This is called a context.
AI keeps re-summerizing the conversation to update the session's context. It condenses and drops words and sentences much like compression does with pixels in a photo, to save space.
You can see this kind of loss in fidelity happening with photos stored as GIF files. Sometimes, the AI summary also looses important parts of a conversation.
AI squeezes narratives more aggressively as session memory gets used up. Then it has to start making guesses at what's missing when it rereads them to put the next prompt it recieves into some kind of context.
When AI gets a guess wrong, we call this a hallucination. AI has to guess often in long conversations.
This is why you can't use AI to search for dissent. Each vendor allocates different amounts of session memory depending on the size of its computing facility. There are billions of new postings each day on the internet. There are 6 billion people on the planet.
If a single AI struggles to just keep its own cognition from fragmenting, can you imagine the consistency of reasoning across a dozen different AIs running with mixed configurations? How does Oracle turn that into anything meaningful?
It's like arguing a mistake on an electric bill is correct just because a computer said so.
Garbage in, and garbage out they say. That seems to apply to machines and Vance's brain.
His insinuation is AI will blacklist whoever says something critical of the regime.
This is the kind of president Vance will be after he takes the reins from Trump. I personally think being a big douche doesn't qualify him for the job. And, Trump was just the packaging.
We are already listed. It's the one made by Musk and DOGE, when they extracted and consolidated all the government records: taxes, healthcare, banking, social security, convictions, citizenship, party affiliation, etc.
Thiel's company "Palantir" is data mining DOGE's records to build lists of any group with specific characteristics in real time, upon request.
Did Peter Thiel And Elon Musk Collude To Stuff DOGE With Their Own Lieutenants?
https://sovereignnations.com/2025/08/18/did-peter-thiel-and-elon-musk-collude-to-stuff-doge-with-their-own-lieutenants/
You don't even have to speak anymore. Somebody else could have said or done something. And, you get selected because you fit their profile in some way, and therefore are theoretically predisposed to doing the same kind of thing.
That's not just thought policing. It's delusional thinking.
This is what should be concerning and STOPPED. Being charged with a crime you are SUPPOSED to commit, on the insistence of some other mad man, is a hallmark of insanity.
And, it's happening RIGHT NOW, with ICE arbitrarily arresting and detaining civilians by carding people.