How Trump Weaponized Racism and Fear To Divide America
From Dog Whistles to Bullhorns: Trump’s Strategy of Division
The Republican Party leveraged racial divisions as a key part of its political playbook in the decades following Richard Nixon's Southern Strategy—a political campaign approach that exploited racial tensions to gain white Southern voters.
Why fix what's not broken when it comes to exploiting fear for votes?
However, few modern politicians have embraced this strategy as explicitly and successfully as Donald Trump.
By reviving and amplifying the racial and cultural grievances that Nixon's campaign subtly exploited, Trump created what can be called Southern Strategy 2.0.
Trump's rise to political prominence and eventual presidency were marked by a sharp increase in the use of overtly racist rhetoric, dog whistles, and policies designed to galvanize white voters, particularly in rural and working-class communities.
In this article, we'll explore how Trump adapted and expanded that tactic for the 21st century, creating a political movement defined by racial polarization.
Trump's Use of Dog Whistles and Overt Racism
While previous Republican politicians often relied on subtle coded language to appeal to racial anxieties, Trump, ever the master of subtlety, amplified the racial and cultural grievances of white voters, particularly in rural and working-class communities.
Trump, by contrast, often discarded the subtlety of dog whistles in favor of overt racism and inflammatory rhetoric—because subtlety is for losers, apparently.
Trump's 2015 campaign launch speech, in which he described Mexican immigrants as "rapists" and criminals, set the tone for his entire political career—because nothing says 'presidential' like casual racism on day one.
This rhetoric continued throughout his presidency, with Trump regularly using dehumanizing language to describe immigrants and refugees.
Key Policies Reflecting Southern Strategy 2.0
Trump’s rhetoric was matched by policies that disproportionately impacted communities of color.
His administration’s "zero-tolerance" immigration policy, which resulted in the separation of thousands of migrant children from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border, was perhaps the most stark example.
This policy, which many critics condemned as inhumane, was designed to send a crystal-clear message to immigrants and asylum seekers: "America’s full, try again never."
Trump’s approach to immigration didn’t stop at family separation. Over the course of his presidency, and even into his post-presidential aspirations, he has continued to push increasingly extreme measures targeting immigrants.
The Border Wall and the “Invasion” Narrative
By emphasizing the need for a border wall and characterizing immigrants as “invaders,” Trump reinforced the fears of white voters who believed that their way of life was under siege from non-white immigrants.
After all, nothing screams “secure borders” like a wall that can be climbed with a $20 ladder.
Undermining Immigrant Representation
Trump’s claims of widespread voter fraud, particularly in urban areas with large Black and Latino populations, echoed historical tactics used to suppress minority votes.
His administration's attempts to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census were widely seen as an effort to undercount immigrant communities and reduce their political representation.
Plans for Mass Deportations and Guantanamo Bay
Trump’s obsession with immigration control has recently taken an even darker turn.
As part of his current campaign promises, Trump has unveiled plans for sweeping mass deportations of undocumented immigrants, a proposal that critics say could result in unprecedented levels of human suffering.
Most concerning, however, is his administration’s decision to transfer immigrants to a detention facility internment camp in Guantanamo Bay—yes, that Guantanamo Bay.
The move has drawn fierce condemnation from human rights advocates, who argue that using a site notorious for its history of indefinite detention and torture sends a chilling signal about the treatment of immigrants under Trump’s leadership.
Through these aggressive policies, both past and proposed, Trump has continued to use immigrants as scapegoats to stoke fear, reinforce racial hierarchies, and energize his base.
Embracing White Nationalism: Charlottesville and Beyond
Trump's refusal to condemn white nationalist groups and his masterclass in equivocation following the Charlottesville rally in 2017 further emboldened these extremist elements.
Trump's response to the violence—claiming there were "very fine people on both sides"—was widely condemned as an endorsement of the white nationalist movement.
Because when Nazis show up, the real problem is apparently the lack of nuance in judging their character.
White nationalists and far-right extremists took Trump's reluctance to condemn them as a signal of tacit approval, and many saw his presidency as a vindication of their beliefs—finally, a president who speaks their language: hate and hashtags.
Pardoning Insurrection: The Latest Round of Trump's Defiance
Just when you thought Trump couldn't possibly outdo himself in the "How to Undermine Democracy" handbook, he decided to go for the gold—because why settle for bronze when chaos is on the line?
In a move that had legal experts reaching for the smelling salts—and probably a stiff drink—Trump issued sweeping pardons for over 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol.
This unprecedented action not only subverted accountability but also sent a clear message of support to extremist elements within his base.
The pardons, which Trump framed as a defense of "political prisoners," effectively nullified the consequences for those who participated in one of the most significant attacks on American democracy in recent history.
Critics argue that this decision could embolden future acts of political violence, setting a dangerous precedent for how insurrectionist behavior might be treated by sympathetic administrations.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, many of the newly pardoned individuals wasted no time in demonstrating their gratitude by promptly getting arrested again, this time on charges ranging from sedition to inciting violence.
For some, a presidential pardon seemed less a chance for redemption and more an opportunity for an encore performance.
This recent act of Trump's presidency is a fitting capstone to his Southern Strategy 2.0. It reinforces his appeal to the most extreme elements of his base while further eroding the foundations of democratic governance.
The pardons not only validate the actions of those who sought to overturn a legitimate election but also cast a long shadow over future efforts to hold political actors accountable for their misdeeds.
Conclusion
By discarding much of the subtlety that characterized Nixon's approach, Trump created a political movement that openly embraced racial resentment and fear of demographic change.
Because nothing says 'progress' like dragging the country back to the 1950s.
The Republican Party now faces a choice: continue down the path of overt racial politics or chart a new course that appeals to an increasingly diverse electorate.
The impact of Trump's transformation of the GOP remains a central question in American politics.
Unfortunately, I don’t think anything will change until the Republican base feels the full painful impact of Trump’s betrayal of American democracy.
To bad all of us have to endure the “Find Out” portion of their education.
Don’t let fear and division win. Join us in holding leaders accountable and fighting for a better future. Subscribe today.
Stay strong,
Samuel