Risking Everything for Power
Is Trump's Nominee Trying to Get American Soldiers Killed?
Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump’s controversial pick for Secretary of Defense, has sparked fierce debate with his radical views on international agreements and alliances.
Hegseth’s recent calls to dismiss NATO and disregard the Geneva Conventions raise critical questions about the safety of American troops and the future of U.S. foreign policy.
Does his approach reflect a strategy for military dominance, or does it expose the very soldiers he claims to champion to greater risks?
Why the Geneva Conventions Matter
After World War II, the Geneva Conventions were created to establish global standards for humane conduct during war.
These agreements, endorsed by over 190 countries, protect soldiers, prisoners, and civilians, limiting the worst excesses of armed conflict.
For decades, these protocols have shielded American soldiers from mistreatment and retaliation, ensuring humane treatment if captured.
Ignoring them would undermine these protections and destabilize the global trust America has built as a leader in ethical warfare.
Hegseth’s Dangerous Proposal
In two recently published books, Hegseth attacked several American alliances and said the U.S. should abandon international laws and agreements like the Geneva Conventions, claiming they hold back the U.S. military. He envisions a force that fights “without constraints,” which he believes will ensure victory.
However, disregarding these rules signals to adversaries that America no longer values mutual protections, potentially inviting brutal retaliation.
This dangerous precedent could leave U.S. soldiers vulnerable to the very inhumane treatment the Geneva Conventions were designed to prevent.
The Lessons of History
Ignoring international war protocols is not without precedent—and history offers stark warnings. Countries that have dismissed these laws often faced prolonged conflicts and widespread condemnation.
During the Vietnam War, allegations of war crimes severely damaged America’s credibility and fueled anti-U.S. sentiment worldwide.
Hegseth’s rhetoric also risks alienating allies like NATO and the UN, which depend on shared commitments to international standards.
Strained alliances leave the U.S. isolated and weaken collective security efforts, emboldening adversaries to act with impunity.
The Ideology Behind the Vision
Hegseth’s approach is deeply rooted in Christian nationalism, blending religious ideology with foreign policy.
He compares modern conflicts to medieval crusades, framing Israel as a spiritual and strategic centerpiece of his worldview.
This theology-driven mindset prioritizes religious symbolism over pragmatic strategy, fostering division and alienating key allies.
Hegseth’s depiction of NATO ally Turkey as an “Islamist threat” risks further destabilizing relationships in an already volatile global arena.
Why Compliance Protects Our Troops
Experts agree that adherence to the Geneva Conventions benefits the U.S. military. Ethical warfare reinforces America’s moral leadership and deters adversaries from resorting to inhumane tactics.
Upholding these standards strengthens alliances and ensures continued support for U.S. efforts abroad.
Abandoning these principles isolates America, exposing soldiers in the field to greater dangers and weakening the trust of global partners.
The Fallout of Hegseth’s Policies
If enacted, Hegseth’s policies could have catastrophic consequences. U.S. troops would face increased threats from adversaries emboldened by the erosion of accountability.
Key alliances with NATO and the UN could fray, leaving the U.S. without crucial support in times of conflict.
More than military operations are at stake—abandoning international law destabilizes the global order that has safeguarded peace for decades. The damage to America’s moral authority could be irreparable.
A Call for Action
These policies aren’t just reckless; they threaten the core principles that protect our troops and preserve global stability. Pete Hegseth’s nomination is about more than one man—it’s about the future of America’s values and the safety of those who serve.
Now is the time to stay informed, speak out, and demand accountability. Together, we can ensure that reckless policies don’t undermine what America stands for.
Stay informed and inspired—join my Substack community today!
Paid subscribers receive weekly eBooks that dive deeper into select topics.
That's why trump wants him...break the rules. No worry he ain't going anywhere senator
Mcbride is a wounded veteran Iraq war. Saw her interviewed by Dana/cnn. She said he's not going to be confirmed got to much bad baggage. Plus his military experience as far as she concerned is nothing to be considered for head of defense. She out ranks him as well and him speaking negative about women serving in the military isn't getting him points w her. She was a helicopter pilot and iud injured her bad...paraplegic. say bye he's not getting confirmed.