Trump’s Demonization of Immigrants and the Southern Strategy 2.0

Trump’s Hardline Policies and Inflammatory Rhetoric Are Key To Deepening Racial Polarization.

Immigration has always been a contentious issue in American politics, but under Donald Trump, it became a central pillar of his Southern Strategy 2.0.

Building on the racial and cultural fears that the original Southern Strategy exploited, Trump takes a hardline stance on immigration, using it as a rallying cry to energize his political base.

By portraying immigrants, particularly from Latin America and Muslim-majority countries, as threats to national security, economic stability, and American identity, Trump further deepens the racial polarization that had long been a tool of the Republican Party.

This article will examine how Trump’s demonization of immigrants became a cornerstone of his political strategy and how it reflects and amplifies the racial divisions inherent in his administration’s racist agenda.

Post-Inauguration Deportation Measures and Economic Fallout

Since his inauguration on January 20, 2025, President Trump has intensified his hardline immigration policies, delivering on his long-promised commitment to deport millions of undocumented immigrants.

The administration launched a series of aggressive operations that span major cities and border regions.

Federal immigration authorities increase raids and broaden the criteria for detention, targeting not only those with criminal records but also large sectors of the undocumented population.

These swift actions have palpable economic consequences. In the agricultural sector, for example, widespread fear of deportation keeps many immigrant farm workers away from their jobs.

The resulting labor shortages disrupt harvest schedules and diminish crop yields, contributing to rising food prices.

This chain reaction is now affecting markets across the country as the scarcity of harvest labor drives up the cost of produce and other foodstuffs.

The immediate implementation of these deportation policies accentuates the stark contrast between campaign rhetoric and policy execution.

It also underscores the profound impact that such strategies have on both communities and the national economy.

Trump’s Border Wall and “Invasion” Rhetoric

From the start of his 2016 campaign, Trump has made immigration the focal point of his platform.

His infamous statement that Mexico is “not sending their best” and that Mexican immigrants are “rapists” and criminals signals a new phase in American political discourse, where xenophobic and racist language becomes not only acceptable but central to a winning electoral strategy.

At the heart of Trump’s immigration rhetoric is his call for a border wall. The wall serves as both a literal and symbolic barrier, representing his administration’s efforts to “protect” America from an influx of immigrants that he frames as a dangerous, invading force.

Trump consistently uses terms like “invasion” and “infestation” to describe immigration at the southern border, further dehumanizing immigrants and stoking fear among his predominantly white voter base.

The emphasis on building a wall is not just a policy proposal—it is a message to white Americans who feel that their cultural and economic dominance is under threat by changing demographics.

The wall became a physical manifestation of Trump’s Southern Strategy 2.0, serving as a reminder that his administration takes extreme measures to protect the interests of native-born (and largely white) Americans at the expense of immigrants.

This rhetoric echoes Nixon’s use of coded language to appeal to white Southerners without explicitly advocating for segregation, but Trump’s version is far less subtle and more confrontational.

The Family Separation Policy: A Racially Charged Tool

One of the most controversial elements of Trump’s immigration strategy is the zero-tolerance policy, which results in the separation of thousands of children from their families at the U.S.-Mexico border.

This policy, implemented in 2018, is part of a broader effort to deter undocumented immigration by inflicting maximum hardship on those attempting to cross the border.

The family separation policy sparks widespread outrage, both domestically and internationally, and is condemned by human rights organizations as inhumane.

However, for Trump’s base, the policy is seen as a necessary measure to “secure the border” and protect American sovereignty.

By framing immigrants as criminals and invaders, Trump justifies the use of such harsh tactics, appealing to voters who believe that immigration poses an existential threat to the nation.

The racial implications of the family separation policy are clear. While framed as an enforcement of immigration law, it disproportionately targets Latino families, many of whom are fleeing violence and persecution in Central America.

This policy fits neatly into Trump’s Southern Strategy 2.0, which uses racialized fear to galvanize his base, similar to how Nixon uses “law and order” to appeal to Southern whites wary of desegregation and civil rights advances.

Attacks on Refugees and Muslims: Broadening the Strategy

Trump’s demonization of immigrants is not limited to those crossing the southern border. His administration also targets refugees and individuals from Muslim-majority countries, further expanding the scope of his racially charged immigration policies.

Early in his presidency, Trump enacted the Muslim travel ban, which bars individuals from several predominantly Muslim countries from entering the United States.

The ban, which Trump first proposed during his 2016 campaign, is rooted in the false belief that Muslim immigrants pose a unique security threat to the U.S.The Muslim ban is a clear example of how Trump’s Southern Strategy 2.0 appeals to a wide range of racial and religious anxieties.

By equating Islam with terrorism, Trump plays into longstanding fears and prejudices against Muslims in America, casting them as outsiders who are incompatible with American values.

This rhetoric, much like his rhetoric about immigrants from Latin America, resonates with voters who are anxious about the country’s increasing diversity and the perceived erosion of traditional American (read: white, Christian) identity.

Similarly, Trump’s administration dramatically reduced the number of refugees allowed into the country, claiming that refugees pose both economic and security risks.
This move is part of a broader effort to limit immigration from non-white countries and reflects the racial hierarchy that underpins much of Trump’s immigration agenda.

By painting refugees—many of whom are fleeing war and persecution—as burdens or threats, Trump reinforces the idea that only certain types of immigrants (primarily white, European immigrants) are desirable.

Framing Immigrants as Criminals and Invaders

One of the most consistent themes of Trump’s immigration strategy is the portrayal of immigrants as criminals, particularly those from Latin America.

Throughout his presidency, Trump frequently highlights crimes committed by undocumented immigrants, using these cases to paint a broad picture of immigrants as violent criminals who pose a threat to public safety.

This strategy is central to his Southern Strategy 2.0. By linking immigrants to crime, Trump taps into the same fears that Nixon exploited with his “law and order” platform in the 1960s.

Just as Nixon’s calls for law and order are a coded appeal to white voters who associate civil rights protests with crime and chaos, Trump’s rhetoric about immigrant crime is designed to stoke fears about the changing demographics of America and reinforce the idea that white, native-born Americans are under siege.

One of the most notable examples of this strategy is Trump’s creation of VOICE (Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement), a program established by the Department of Homeland Security to highlight crimes committed by undocumented immigrants.

While studies consistently show that immigrants—both documented and undocumented—are less likely to commit crimes than native-born Americans, Trump’s creation of VOICE is a deliberate effort to push a false narrative that immigrant crime is a widespread problem.

This narrative fits seamlessly into his broader strategy of using racial and cultural fear to mobilize his base.

Conclusion: Immigration as the Cornerstone of Trump’s Southern Strategy 2.0

Donald Trump’s approach to immigration is a defining feature of his Southern Strategy 2.0, one that relies heavily on racialized fear and division to maintain political power.

By framing immigrants as criminals, invaders, and economic threats, Trump appeals to the anxieties of white voters who feel that their way of life is under threat from a diversifying America.

Trump’s policies, from the family separation policy to the Muslim travel ban, reflect a broader effort to maintain white dominance in an increasingly multicultural society.
In many ways, Trump’s immigration strategy is a direct continuation of the Southern Strategy’s appeal to white racial resentment, but it is also a significant escalation.

Where Nixon and his successors rely on dog whistles and coded language to appeal to white voters, Trump often abandons subtlety altogether, using overtly racist and xenophobic rhetoric to energize his base.

Trump’s embrace of these tactics also emboldens white nationalist and far-right extremist groups, further deepening the racial polarization that defines his presidency.

Support fearless, independent journalism that gets into “good trouble, necessary trouble” by holding power accountable.

Stay strong,
Samuel