Trump's Wild Ride Through the Swamp
A Masterclass in Mismanagement
Step right up to the greatest political show on Earth!
Welcome to the spectacle of President-elect Donald Trump's cabinet selection process.
Trump's transition team is juggling flaming chainsaws while trying to assemble a cabinet. Let's dive into this three-ring circus of withdrawals, vulnerabilities, and controversies that's making Washington spin faster than a tilt-a-whirl!
The Dropout Zone: Where Nominees Go to Disappear
In the high-stakes game of political musical chairs, some of Trump's picks seem to have lost their seat before the music even stopped.
These rapid withdrawals not only highlight the chaotic nature of the transition process but also raise questions about the vetting procedures – or lack thereof – in Team Trump.
Let's take a closer look at two of the most notable dropouts:
Chad Chronister: The DEA's "Almost" Drug Czar
Chad Chronister, Trump's pick for the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), pulled a Houdini and vanished from the nomination faster than you can utter, "Just Say No."
Highlights of this magic act include:
Chronister cited "ongoing initiatives" as his reason for withdrawal. Translation: "I'd rather wrangle Florida Man than deal with this circus."
He faced backlash for arresting a pastor during COVID. Apparently, "Thou shalt not gather" wasn't in the Bible.
His holistic approach to drug issues was too kumbaya for the hardliners. Who knew empathy could be so controversial?
Matt Gaetz: The Attorney General Who Wasn't
Matt Gaetz withdrew his AG nomination faster than you can swipe left on Tinder. The reason? Allegations of paying a 17-year-old for... well, let's just say it wasn't for babysitting.
Gaetz denies it, but his political career is now about as alive as Monty Python's parrot.
The Walking Dead: Nominees on Life Support
While some nominees have already thrown in the towel, others are clinging to their nominations with the desperation of a sloth on a greased pole.
These walking political zombies are stumbling through a minefield of controversies, each step threatening to blow their chances sky-high.
Let's examine some of the nominees who are more vulnerable than a snowman in a heatwave:
Pete Hegseth: The Secretary of Defense(less)
Trump's pick for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, carries more baggage than an airport carousel.
His rap sheet includes:
More marital drama than a soap opera
Accusations of misconduct that make "The Wolf of Wall Street" look tame
Views so far right, they make Attila the Hun look like a liberal snowflake
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: The Anti-Vaxxer-in-Chief
RFK Jr.'s Health and Human Services Secretary nomination is about as popular as a flat-earther at a NASA convention.
His vaccine skepticism has the medical community reaching for the smelling salts.
Charles Kushner: The Ambassador of "Oops, I Did It Again"
Charles Kushner's nomination as U.S. Ambassador to France is raising more eyebrows than a Botox convention.
With a criminal record that would make Jean Valjean blush, this nomination is as smooth as a cheese grater.
Kash Patel: The FBI's Least Wanted
Kash Patel's nomination for FBI Director has Democrats reaching for their "In Case of Emergency" wine stashes.
His plans to overhaul the FBI have agents wondering if they'll be trading in their badges for MAGA hats.
The Tulsi Tango: A Dance with Controversy
In a move that has Washington insiders doing a double-take, Trump has nominated Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence.
This choice is so out of left field, it's practically in the parking lot. Let's break down why this nomination is causing more head-scratching than a lice outbreak:
Tulsi Gabbard: The Spy Who Came in from the... Wait, Where?
Tulsi Gabbard's nomination as Director of National Intelligence is like casting Borat as James Bond.
Here's why the intelligence community is having a collective aneurysm:
Her intelligence experience is about as deep as a kiddie pool
She's been cozier with authoritarian leaders than a cat in a sunbeam
Her comments on Russia and Ukraine have more spin than a washing machine
The Senate is so excited about her confirmation hearings that they're considering selling popcorn.
The DOJ Deal: Trump's "Fine, I'll Play Nice" Moment
In a plot twist worthy of M. Night Shyamalan, Trump has agreed to let the DOJ do background checks. It's like watching a toddler reluctantly share their toys.
This unexpected move has Washington wondering if Trump's been body-snatched or if he's just playing one-dimensional chess.
Let's dive into what this surprising development means:
What This Means:
FBI screenings: Because nothing says "drain the swamp" like actually vetting people
A signed MOU: More paperwork than a tax audit
Potential for faster confirmations: Or at least faster rejections
The Road Ahead: More Twists Than a Pretzel Factory
As we look to the future of Trump's cabinet formation, it's clear that we're in for a wild ride. The path forward is about as straightforward as a carnival funhouse, with each turn revealing new challenges and unexpected obstacles.
Here's what we can expect as this political rollercoaster continues:
Ethics concerns: Trump's team opted out of an ethics agreement. Shocking, we know.
Trump's veto power: He can still override the DOJ faster than you can say, "You're fired!"
Senate showdowns: Grab your popcorn, folks. These hearings will be more dramatic than "The Bachelor" finale.
Media frenzy: The press is circling like sharks at a chum festival.
Conclusion: The Show Must Go On
As we approach the confirmation hearings, Trump's cabinet selection process remains more unpredictable than a game of Jumanji.
Will his team navigate this minefield of controversies, or will it blow up spectacularly?
One thing's for sure: in this political circus, expect the unexpected. Stay tuned, America – this show is far from over!
Stay informed and inspired—join my Substack community today!
Paid subscribers receive weekly eBooks that dive deeper into select topics.
My honest prediction?
This evil old creature dies early in his administration. He looks near to death already; he does not look well at all.
I think this is why Elon Musk lampreyed himself onto Trump within just the last year. Unlike the Orangeish It, Musk does not seek just money alone; except to the extent that money buys him Control and Power. Those are the things he wants; he wants Power. 
What better to do then, then attach yourself to an evil diapered old man… whom you previously professed your lack of respect for? Who else did that, that we know of? JD Vance?
Could these two work hand in hand then… To rob this diapered old boy in his dotage; of this presidency?
Elon cannot gain the presidency for himself by himself… because he is a non-citizen, he will never be able to run for it , without an Amendment to the Constitution, or Act of Congress, I believe.
But Musk DOES gain everything he wants… As soon as It is removed. Do you want wild speculation? Of course you do. You’re on Samuel’s page, after all.
Therefore, would it be beyond Musk’s desire for power… To help Trump leave this world, perhaps with JD‘s help?
These two are far, far beyond the Evil Old Man’s powers of comprehension and intelligence.
‘Twūd be nothing uh-tall for these two… to have a slightly bitter tasting quarter pounder and fish fillet served to this old fool.
There you go. That’s what I personally think… But I could be wrong. That’s where I think this is headed. 
If nothing else, it would make for a great movie script; somewhat along the lines of Stephen King’s “The Dead Zone“; although I thought that novel/movie far more apropos to the attempted assassination of It, on July 13 of this year in Pennsylvania… by a bookish young man, at one of Its campaign events.
I don’t put anything past these evil creeps. Nothing.  🥺
https://substack.com/home/post/p-152847663
AN OPEN LETTER TO TULSI GABBARD
"Your nomination as Director of National Intelligence (DNI) is not just a misstep—it’s a catastrophe waiting to happen. Entrusting someone with your record—marked by overt sympathies for despots, a troubling embrace of conspiracy theories, and a consistent undermining of credible intelligence—with safeguarding America’s security is a risk this country cannot afford to take."