It's Time To Shift From Protest to Civil Disobedience

No Kings Project Needs To Evolve

The “No Kings” movement, a necessary and righteous response to the threat of American authoritarianism, has successfully channeled the public’s anger into visible protest. But for this vital energy to create lasting change, it must evolve.

The movement is at a critical crossroads, in danger of becoming a predictable “Democratic Party spectacle” that serves the political establishment more than it challenges the deep structures of power.

The path forward requires not a new strategy, but the reclamation of a proven one: the disciplined, disruptive, and radical nonviolence of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

The Peril of Partisan Protest

When a protest movement is dominated by speeches from incumbent politicians, it risks losing its independent moral authority.

One observer of a “No Kings Day” event noted that the “will of the people rather collided with the self-serving ambitions of Democratic Party speakers who hogged microphones.”

This dynamic transforms a grassroots uprising into a partisan rally, alienating the many Americans weary of all corrupt politics and silencing the very voices a true resistance must amplify.

By defaulting to existing power hierarchies, the movement’s radical potential is channeled into safe, predictable activities that serve electoral ends rather than revolutionary ones.

To truly defend democracy, the movement must be more than a “facelift to the moribund Democratic Party.” It must become an independent force.

The Real King: A Disciplined Radical

To break free, we must look to a leader whose legacy has been sanitized to make him safe.

The popular image of Dr. King as a gentle dreamer is a profound distortion. The real King was a brilliant tactician who fused Christian theology with Gandhian methods to create “one of the most potent weapons available to oppressed people.”

His philosophy was built on six core principles that transform nonviolence from a passive idea into a comprehensive way of life.

1. Nonviolence is a way of life for courageous people. It is not a method for cowards but an active, aggressive resistance to evil—spiritually, mentally, and emotionally. It requires the strength to resist violence without resorting to it.
   

2. Nonviolence seeks to win friendship and understanding. The goal is not to defeat or humiliate an opponent, but to awaken a sense of moral shame. The end result is redemption and reconciliation, with the ultimate purpose of creating the “Beloved Community.”
   

3. Nonviolence seeks to defeat injustice, not people. The struggle is directed against evil systems and unjust acts, not the individuals who commit them. King recognized that “evildoers are also victims” of the systems they perpetuate.
   

4. Nonviolence holds that suffering can educate and transform. This principle involves a willingness to accept suffering without retaliation, to take blows without striking back. King believed unearned suffering is redemptive and has tremendous power to convert an opponent when reason fails.
   

5. Nonviolence chooses love instead of hate. This is not sentimental affection but agape love—a spontaneous, unselfish, and creative love for all humanity. It resists not only physical violence but also the “internal violence of the spirit,” refusing to hate the opponent.
   

6. Nonviolence believes that the universe is on the side of justice. The nonviolent resister has a deep faith that justice will eventually win. This conviction provides the hope and strength to endure the struggle.

Civil Disobedience: The Engine of Change

King’s philosophy, particularly the principle of redemptive suffering, demands more than rallies; it requires the courage to engage in civil disobedience.

The Freedom Riders who were beaten for integrating buses and the marchers gassed on “Bloody Sunday” were not simply victims; they were strategic actors using their suffering to expose the violent reality of an unjust system.

In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” King provided the moral framework for this escalation. He argued that individuals have a responsibility to break unjust laws, and that the greatest obstacle to freedom was not the overt bigot, but the “white moderate, who is more devoted to ‘order’ than to justice.”

This is a direct challenge to the modern preference for comfortable, orderly protests over the kind of disruptive action that creates a crisis and forces real change.

As King noted in his letter, “freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.”

From Persuasion to Power

King’s own strategy evolved over time. After the landmark legislative victories of the mid 1960s, he saw that moral persuasion alone was not enough to dismantle entrenched economic inequality and systemic racism.

His thinking matured “to a new level:” mass civil disobedience. He argued that ethical appeals “must be undergirded by some form of constructive coercive power.” This was not an abandonment of nonviolence, but a strategic escalation.

King came to define power as “the ability to achieve purpose... the strength to bring about social, political, and economic changes.”

The goal was to organize the powerless into “units of power” capable of disrupting the normal functioning of society, making it more costly for the system to continue its oppressive practices than to change them.

Join the resistance. Subscribe for more fearless commentary. Your support keeps this space open and ad-free for everyone, paid or unpaid.

A Blueprint for the “No Kings” Movement

King’s Six Steps of Nonviolent Social Change offer a proven roadmap for turning principle into practice. This is not a menu of options, but a strategic sequence for building a powerful and disciplined campaign.

1. Information Gathering: The first step is to investigate, collecting all vital information from all sides of an issue. This means talking to everyone involved and putting away assumptions to fully understand the problem.
   

2. Education: Once armed with knowledge, the duty is to educate others - neighbors, friends, and coworkers - to build a broad coalition of people devoted to finding solutions.
   

3. Personal Commitment: A campaign for justice is a long and difficult process. This step requires participants to reinforce their personal commitment to the cause and to nonviolence, supporting each other to avoid burnout.
   

4. Negotiation: With a clear understanding of the issue and a committed coalition, the next step is to confront the opposition with a list of injustices and a plan for resolution. The goal is a win-win situation, seeking to win over the opponent, not defeat them.
   

5. Direct Action: This step is taken only when negotiations fail. It includes tactics like peaceful demonstrations, boycotts, and sit-ins, designed to create a constructive tension that forces the opposition back to the negotiating table.
   

6. Reconciliation: The final and most important step is reconciliation. The goal is to create understanding and unity, transforming adversaries into allies and building the Beloved Community.

The “No Kings” movement stands at a precipice. It can continue as a series of laudable but contained protests, or it can choose a more courageous and powerful path.

By embracing the disciplined, strategic, and radical love of Dr. King’s method, it can become more than a reaction to fascism. It can become a transformative force that can truly begin to build the Beloved Community and bend the “arc of the moral universe toward... justice.”