Part 2: Racial Fuckery Reignited: Trump's Modern-Day Southern Strategy
How Trump Weaponized Division to Transform the GOP
Enjoying the content? Help support independent journalism by becoming a paid subscriber!
In the decades following Richard Nixon’s Southern Strategy, the Republican Party continued to leverage racial divisions as a key part of its political playbook.
However, few modern politicians have embraced this strategy as explicitly and successfully as Donald Trump.
By reviving and amplifying the racial and cultural grievances that Nixon’s campaign subtly exploited, Trump created what can be called Southern Strategy 2.0.
Trump’s rise to political prominence and eventual presidency were marked by a sharp increase in the use of overtly racist rhetoric, dog whistles, and policies designed to galvanize white voters, particularly in rural and working-class communities.
In this article, we’ll explore how Trump adapted and expanded the Southern Strategy for the 21st century, creating a political movement defined by racial polarization.
Trump’s Use of Dog Whistles and Overt Racism
One of the hallmarks of Nixon’s Southern Strategy was the use of coded language, or dog whistles, that appealed to white voters’ racial anxieties without overtly invoking race.
Trump, by contrast, often discarded the subtlety of dog whistles in favor of overt racism and inflammatory rhetoric.
From the beginning of his political career, Trump positioned himself as a defender of traditional American values, a euphemism often used to appeal to white, Christian voters who felt alienated by the country’s increasing diversity.
Trump’s 2015 campaign launch speech, in which he described Mexican immigrants as “rapists” and criminals, set the tone for his entire political career.
This statement wasn’t just inflammatory—it was a clear signal to a segment of white voters who feared demographic change and believed that immigrants posed a threat to their economic and social status.
Trump’s rhetoric was not limited to Mexican immigrants, either. His repeated calls for a “Muslim ban” and his derogatory remarks about African countries, which he referred to as “shithole countries,” demonstrated his willingness to engage in overtly racist speech to energize his base.
At the same time, Trump continued to employ dog whistles that echoed Nixon’s era, albeit in more direct terms.
Trump’s frequent references to "law and order" during the 2016 campaign, particularly in response to the Black Lives Matter movement and protests against police brutality, resonated with voters who associated crime with Black and brown communities.
While Nixon had used similar language to appeal to Southern voters wary of civil rights advancements, Trump’s messaging was amplified by social media and 24-hour news cycles, allowing him to dominate the conversation and keep racial and cultural issues at the forefront of his campaign.
Key Policies Reflecting Southern Strategy 2.0
Trump’s Southern Strategy 2.0 was not limited to rhetoric. Throughout his presidency, he implemented policies that reflected the racial anxieties and grievances he stoked during his campaign.
One of the most prominent examples was the Trump administration’s immigration policy, which included the infamous “zero-tolerance” policy that led to the separation of families at the U.S.-Mexico border.
This policy, which many critics condemned as inhumane, was designed to send a clear message to immigrants and asylum seekers: you are not welcome in America.
The policy also played directly into Trump’s portrayal of immigrants as a threat to national security and American identity, a central theme of his Southern Strategy 2.0.
By emphasizing the need for a border wall and characterizing immigrants as “invaders,” Trump reinforced the fears of white voters who believed that their way of life was under siege from non-white immigrants.
This narrative echoed Nixon’s emphasis on "law and order" and states' rights, but it was more explicitly focused on maintaining white dominance in the face of a diversifying population.
In addition to immigration, Trump’s policies on voting rights also reflected the racial dimensions of his strategy. His baseless claims of widespread voter fraud, particularly in predominantly Black and Latino communities, were part of a broader effort to delegitimize the political power of non-white voters.
Trump’s repeated attacks on mail-in voting and his efforts to restrict voting access were seen by many as an attempt to suppress minority turnout and maintain the political dominance of his overwhelmingly white voter base.
This approach was reminiscent of the voter suppression tactics used during the Jim Crow era, further linking Trump’s strategy to the original Southern Strategy’s efforts to maintain white political control.
Embracing White Nationalism: Charlottesville and Beyond
One of the most striking aspects of Trump’s Southern Strategy 2.0 was his failure to distance himself from white nationalist and far-right extremist groups.
Perhaps the most infamous example of this occurred after the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where white supremacists and neo-Nazis clashed with counter-protesters, resulting in the death of anti-racism activist Heather Heyer.
Trump’s response to the violence—claiming there were “very fine people on both sides”—was widely condemned as an endorsement of the white nationalist movement.
This moment was a defining example of how Trump’s Southern Strategy 2.0 went beyond dog whistles and into outright legitimization of extremist groups.
White nationalists and far-right extremists took Trump’s reluctance to condemn them as a signal of tacit approval, and many saw his presidency as a vindication of their beliefs.
The Southern Strategy of the past sought to appeal to racial resentment without explicitly aligning with segregationists or white supremacists, but Trump’s version blurred those lines, giving these groups a platform and a sense of legitimacy in mainstream American politics.
Another example of Trump’s embrace of extremist rhetoric came during the first presidential debate of 2020 when he was asked to condemn the Proud Boys, a far-right group involved in violent protests.
Rather than denouncing the group, Trump told them to “stand back and stand by,” a statement that many interpreted as an endorsement of their activities. This marked a significant departure from the traditional use of dog whistles and underscored the increasingly overt nature of Trump’s racial strategy.
Readers Like You Keep This Free
This platform is powered by readers like you. Your support allows us to keep all content free and accessible to everyone.
Conclusion: Trump’s Southern Strategy 2.0 in Action
Donald Trump’s Southern Strategy 2.0 represents a modernized and more aggressive version of the racial politics that Nixon used to transform the Republican Party in the late 1960s.
By discarding much of the subtlety that characterized Nixon’s approach, Trump created a political movement that openly embraced racial resentment and fear of demographic change.
Trump’s use of dog whistles, combined with overt racism and policies designed to marginalize non-white communities, solidified his support among white voters who felt threatened by the country’s growing diversity.
While Trump’s presidency may be over, the legacy of his Southern Strategy 2.0 lives on in American politics and could return if the Harris campaign doesn’t turn out the vote.
When Democrats vote, Democrats win. It’s that simple!
The racial divisions he stoked during his campaign and presidency continue to shape the GOP’s electoral strategy, and his embrace of white nationalist groups has had a lasting impact on political discourse in the United States.
In the next article, we’ll explore how Trump’s demonization of immigrants became a cornerstone of his Southern Strategy 2.0, further deepening racial polarization in the country.
If you aren’t already subscribed, take a minute to join us so you don't miss a thing!
Through his policies as president and his speech as president and after, Trump has continuously legitimized "hate" as an American value - a value that I don't think any of the Founding Fathers would have condoned and one that "civilized" nations should aspire to evolve beyond. Great series tying the past to the present. I'd love to hear more about other architect/villains, past and present, who've caused this divide because I don't think Trump acted alone.
https://www.newsletter.samuel-warde.com/p/racial-fuckery-reignited-trumps-modern